apositivefarce

jakegyllencallme:

every time someone send you hate, send them this back

Why Hate Speech by Presidential Candidates is Despicable

robertreich:

On Friday, a gunman killed three at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Colorado. Later, in explaining his motive to the police, he said “no more baby parts.”

Last Monday, gunmen opened fire on Black Lives Matter protesters in Minneapolis who were demanding action against two white Minneapolis police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Jamar Clark, 24, an unarmed black man, on Nov. 15.

Evidence shows the accused shooters were linked to white supremacist organizations operating online.

In a video that surfaced before the shootings, one of two men on the way to the protest says “we’re going to go see what these f—– dindus are up to,” using slang insulting toward African Americans. He then brandishes a pistol and says, “we are locked and loaded.”

Meanwhile, the FBI reports an upturn in threats on mosques and Muslims in the United States.

In Connecticut, police are investigating reports of multiple gunshots fired at a local mosque. Two Tampa Bay-area mosques in Florida received threatening phone messages. One of the calls threatened a firebombing.

In an Austin suburb, leaders of the Islamic Center of Pflugerville discovered feces and torn pages of the Qur’an.

Hate crimes will never be eliminated entirely. A small number of angry, deranged people inevitably will vent their rage at groups they find threatening. Some will do so violently.

But this doesn’t absolve politicians who have been fueling such hatefulness.

Perpetrators of hate crimes often take their cues from what they hear in the media. And the recent inclination of some politicians to use inflammatory rhetoric is contributing to a climate of hate and fear. 

Carly Fiorina continues to allege, for example, that Planned Parenthood is selling body parts of fetuses.

Although the claim has been proven baseless, it’s been repeated not only by Fiorina but also by other candidates. Mike Huckabee calls it “sickening” that “we give these butchers money to harvest human organs.”

Even in the wake of Friday’s Colorado shootings, Donald Trump referred to videos “with some of these people from Planned Parenthood talking about it like you’re selling parts to a car.”

Some candidates are also fomenting animus toward Muslims.

Huckabee says he’d “like for Barack Obama to resign if he’s not going to protect America and instead protect the image of Islam.”

Ben Carson says allowing Syrian refugees into the United States is analogous to exposing a neighborhood to a “rabid dog.” Last September Carson said he “would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation.”

Since the attacks that killed 130 people in Paris earlier this month, Trump has advocated registering all Muslims in the United States and putting American mosques under surveillance.

He’s also claimed that Muslim-Americans in New Jersey celebrated by the “thousands” when the World Trade Center was destroyed on September 11, 2001, although there’s no evidence to back that claim.

Indeed, much of Trump’s campaign is built on hatefulness. And Trump not only fails to condemn violence he provokes but finds excuses for it.

After a handful of white supporters recently punched and attempted to choke a Black Lives Matter protester at one of his campaign rallies, Trump said “maybe he should have been roughed up.”

Trump began his campaign last June by falsely alleging Mexican immigrants are “bringing crime. They’re rapists.”

Weeks later in Boston, two brothers beat with a metal poll and urinated on a 58-year-old homeless Mexican national. They subsequently told the police “Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported.“

But instead of condemning that brutality, Trump excused it by saying “people who are following me are very passionate. They love this country and they want this country to be great again.”

I’m not suggesting Trump, Carson, Fiorina, or any other presidential candidate is directly to blame for hate crimes erupting across America.

But by virtue of their standing as presidential candidates, their words carry particular weight. They have a responsibility to calm people with the truth rather than stir them up with lies. 

In suggesting that the staff of Planned Parenthood, Muslims, Black Lives Matter protesters, and Mexican immigrants are guilty of venal acts, these candidates are fanning the flames of hate.

This itself is despicable.

tasteoftheusual:

Sensates + virtues [insp.]

original idea from this post (x)

micdotcom:

anarchasaurus:

stfueverything:

micdotcom:

Watch: It’s your right to share your salary, not doing so could be holding you back.

I’ve always done this because I believe this exact thing. Share your salaries y’all. There’s a reason companies say it’s taboo to discuss it.

That includes non-salaried workers too – especially in food service!
Its bullshit to allow such huge wage gaps to occur in restaurant work

In case you don’t believe employers don’t want you talking about your salary, look at what happened at Google when one female employee started a spreadsheet for voluntary salary sharing.

sandandglass:

Stephen Colbert thanks Jon Stewart for everything he’s done

progressivefriends:
“ theliberaltony:
“ If you want to see into Trump’s future, look into his past.“There’s a new Donald Trump documentary out, and what’s new is old — 25 years old, to be exact.
The filmmakers behind “Trump: What’s the Deal?” decided...

progressivefriends:

theliberaltony:

If you want to see into Trump’s future, look into his past.

There’s a new Donald Trump documentary out, and what’s new is old — 25 years old, to be exact.

The filmmakers behind “Trump: What’s the Deal?” decided they couldn’t be silenced any longer now that Trump is running for president.

As they point out on their website, the film was commissioned in 1988 by Leonard Stern; the Trump documentary was the first in a series that looked at celebrity businessmen. It was finished three years later — but few ever saw it. And it wasn’t necessarily because people avoided it or because it was a terrible documentary.

Back then, the only way for a film to be seen was on television or in the theater. Donald threatened to sue any broadcaster or distributor that took on the film. In effect, it was suppressed. It was screened twice in back-to-back standing room only showings at the Bridgehampton Community House on July 3, 1991, the same day that Donald announced his engagement to Marla Maples.

The filmmakers say they want the “American people to meet the real Donald and learn how he does business.”(x)

You can watch the Full Documentary here

for late night viewing

Thanks for your post about following your dream. I was just wondering, though, what if you don't really have a dream at all? Growing up I got high grades and was told I could do anything I wanted, but now I feel pressurised to Meet My Potential and Do Something Amazing with my life considering what I have achieved. I feel as though all my life I have just been working hard for the sake of getting good marks, and I am left directionless and without any idea of what I want to do with my life.
Anonymous

stephy-fox:

learnhowtoadult:

image

This. It is literally so. fucking. hard. to unlearn what they told you as a bright and capable child. That you have so much potential, and you can go so far, and do incredible things. Maybe clever kids don’t all need to save humanity and become human rights lawyers and brain surgeons. Maybe they will make the world a better place just doing what makes them feel fizzy at the start of each day.

pondarling:

matt-smith:

do you ever just passionately miss the first series of doctor who but not just because you miss Nine but because you miss the monsters and the simple story lines that were new and so interesting and the companions that didn’t need a magic back story to be special and weren’t just a new puzzle for the doctor to solve they were just ordinary people with ordinary lives and taught (especially the young viewers) that anyone can be a hero i just really miss season one okay

image

greenglowsgold:

Fox News + Night Vale tweets

house-of-thought:
“ Viking Magic Wand
For decades the experts at the British Museum believed that this item, discovered at a woman’s grave from Norway was just a hook used in fishing. However, new research suggests that it was her ‘magic wand’ and...

house-of-thought:

Viking Magic Wand

For decades the experts at the British Museum believed that this item, discovered at a woman’s grave from Norway was just a hook used in fishing. However, new research suggests that it was her ‘magic wand’ and that it was deliberately bent to destroy its power.

The Times newspaper reported that this item, a 90 cm long iron rod, was first brought to the British Museum in 1894. British Museum curator Sue Branning believes that it was probably a magical staff used to perform ‘seithr’, a form of Viking sorcery predominantly practiced by women.

She told The Times: ”These are magical practices, which we don’t fully understand. It involves divination, prophecy, communication with the dead and making people do things. Our rod fits, in terms of its form, with a number of these rods that turn up in the 9th and 10th century in female burials. They normally take the form of these long iron rods with knobs attached to them.”

The rod would have been ‘ritually’ destroyed in order to prevent the sorceress from rising from the dead, or to stop anyone else from using it. Branning adds, ”When we hear about the Vikings we hear all about the powerful warriors, but now we know there were also powerful women. These women were very well respected, but they were quite feared as well. They may have been on the margins of society. You might not want to get close to them because they have this power. The sources we have describe them as wearing blue and black cloaks with gems attached.”

Source